Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2006 18:33:46 GMT -5
 I find this very amusing. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2006 3:24:25 GMT -5
3 MILLION DOLLARS!
What a joke! I'd never pay 3 million dollars for a PS3, or any other games console for that matter. Why couldn't they just wait?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2006 5:43:51 GMT -5
I think the company is getting desperate, because they lose money for everytime they keep it back, and tons of game companies are refusing to make games for them...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2006 8:25:39 GMT -5
Sony are ebign beaten in everything. They are now trying to focus on thier game consoles, but they lsoing 100 dollars per console because it takes 700 dolalrs to make and tey selling at 600 dollars. \The more they sell the less money they have. A bit stupid if you ask me
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2006 10:05:06 GMT -5
Their problem is they aren't focussing on the games anymore. Take a look at the PS3. Video player and camera and mp3 player etc. Those aren't essential, but they push the price up. Their trying to make the PS3 into a multimedia home entertainment system, and driving up the price. They should have stuck with just making a console for games, like the PS1 and 2.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2006 10:27:08 GMT -5
Sony are ebign beaten in everything. They are now trying to focus on thier game consoles, but they lsoing 100 dollars per console because it takes 700 dolalrs to make and tey selling at 600 dollars. \The more they sell the less money they have. A bit stupid if you ask me They are losing around $250 per 60 GB, and $241 on each 20GB. |
|
|
|
Post by Timewarp on Nov 21, 2006 14:21:39 GMT -5
thats right pyro why don't they realise that gamers buy a consul to play good decent games not to do everything BUT play good games
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2006 16:41:56 GMT -5
Not necessarily pt i mean the s3's gizmo's make it expensive, but a pc ican do msot of that and it not that much. The ps3 is expensive becuase it has a processor eqaul to a super compuer to do each bit of it. hat boost the price. without that it woudl be i dunno abou 300 odd. xbox 360 price.
Also the ps2 and even the ps3 weren't solel game consoles. ps1 could play mic and ps2 dds and music
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2006 10:15:50 GMT -5
Yeah, but those were add-ons. Those were for games. You don't need a HD DVD player to play final fantasy do you?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2006 11:24:32 GMT -5
meh it nto eveen got a dvd player it plays blu rays.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2006 11:04:10 GMT -5
The problem with Blu-ray?
1) they're having problems with it
2) It contains so much data that the makers of the games have to put more in so they don't make as many games.
3) The disks are probably more expensive. More expensive means that you can't get many games( but you'd have to be stinking rich to be able to get a PS3 if you were our age-or saved forever- so money may not be such a big problem.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2006 11:37:04 GMT -5
the gmaes are being at least 50 quid.
|
|
|
|
Post by Timewarp on Nov 27, 2006 13:52:41 GMT -5
what moren would pay 3 million for a PS3
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2006 14:01:39 GMT -5
erm bill gate. it othing for him
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2006 15:53:45 GMT -5
omg! $3,000,100 for a ps3?thats ourageous!!!im gonna wait till kingdom hearts 3 comes out 2 get 1
|
|
